<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BuzzMaven SEO / SEM Consultants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmaven.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmaven.com</link>
	<description>The Search Marketing Consultancy of Scott Clark</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:10:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Implications of Reduced Corporate Blogging</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2012/01/seo-implications-of-reduced-corporate-blogging.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2012/01/seo-implications-of-reduced-corporate-blogging.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO/SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmaven.com/?p=4743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I saw an article on ReadWrite that caught my attention&#8230;&#8221;Blogging declines across Inc 500&#8221; which referred to a study from Umass called &#8220;Blogging declines as newer tools rule.&#8221;  The number dropped from 50% to 37% of companies maintaining corporate blog.  Facebook and Twitter, in the meantime continue to grow.   This stands to reason [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2012/01/seo-implications-of-reduced-corporate-blogging.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multiple Admin Support on Google Plus Pages Now Available</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2012/01/multiple-admin-support-on-google-plus-pages-now-available.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2012/01/multiple-admin-support-on-google-plus-pages-now-available.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google plus pages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmaven.com/?p=4731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Previously, I had posted about the lack of multiple managers for Google Plus pages, a fact that made creation and delegation of such pages awkward in the real world.  Well, I can say now that the feature is available.  (h/t/  Impulse Webdesign for emailing me about it while I was on holiday.)   I am looking forward [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2012/01/multiple-admin-support-on-google-plus-pages-now-available.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[updated] Multiple Admins in Google Plus Pages for Businesses &#8211; Seriously?</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/11/no-multiple-admins-in-google-plus-pages-for-businesses-seriously.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/11/no-multiple-admins-in-google-plus-pages-for-businesses-seriously.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 14:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Changes Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RANT!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shiny New]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google plus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmaven.com/?p=4707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(New! Google has fast-tracked this fix&#8230;.and it is now available!!) I wanted to put up a quick post to express my disappointment that Google has not made even the most basic administrative feature for the real world available in its launch of Google+ Pages.  This is a continuation of its previous omission from allowing multiple [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/11/no-multiple-admins-in-google-plus-pages-for-businesses-seriously.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Explorer Users&#8217; Health Tip</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/10/internet-explorer-users-health-tip.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/10/internet-explorer-users-health-tip.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Just for Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmaven.com/?p=4699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; A bit of fun this Friday:]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/10/internet-explorer-users-health-tip.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New BuzzMaven Site Coming</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/10/new-buzzmaven-site-coming.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/10/new-buzzmaven-site-coming.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 20:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Changes Online]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmaven.com/?p=4696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of you may have noticed that the site (now 5 years old)  has been &#8220;iffy&#8221; lately when you first visit.   The issue is a plugin incompatibility that is non-trivial to fix. Well, a brand new BuzzMaven.com is in the works and should be on-line by November 1st, according to my developer.  Adam Kuhn [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/10/new-buzzmaven-site-coming.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Place Pages Dropping Some 3rd Party Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/07/thirdpartyreviews-googleplaces.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/07/thirdpartyreviews-googleplaces.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO/SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Changes Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmaven.com/?p=4667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For businesses who have been &#8220;riding the wave&#8221; of 3rd party reviews on their highly-visible Google Place page, you&#8217;ll want to pay attention to this, and act to shore up your listings. I personally observed this morning a business go from 63 reviews (with 4/5 stars) to 5 reviews (with 2/5 stars) If your business [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/07/thirdpartyreviews-googleplaces.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Posting Effectiveness, Times, Days, Story Types</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/07/facebook-posting-effectiveness-times-days-story-types.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/07/facebook-posting-effectiveness-times-days-story-types.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmaven.com/?p=4656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today on the Facebook and Journalism page, a really great note was released aimed at helping news organizations optimize the effectiveness of their Facebook Pages.   I found that the information was probably applicable to any sort of published content, whether or not you are a news organization.  I quote heavily: &#8220;Top Stories: Readers are reacting [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/07/facebook-posting-effectiveness-times-days-story-types.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Expert Leaked &#8211; Will Human Answers Mingle with Search Results Soon?</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/06/google-expert-leaked-will-human-answers-mingle-with-search-results-soon.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/06/google-expert-leaked-will-human-answers-mingle-with-search-results-soon.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Changes Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO/SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmaven.com/?p=4647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve heard today that Google may be planning a Quora-like Q/A service (possibly named &#8220;Google Expert&#8221;) that leverages their acquisition of Aardvark and integrates with Google Plus (or Google+, however you like it.)   This model of finding answers by humans fits nicely into the new social search model that seems to be making its way [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/06/google-expert-leaked-will-human-answers-mingle-with-search-results-soon.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Ranking Factors &#8211; 2009 and 2011 Compared</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/06/seo-ranking-factors-2009-and-2011-compared.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/06/seo-ranking-factors-2009-and-2011-compared.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO/SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presentations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmaven.com/?p=4637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the excellent SEOMOZ ranking factors slide deck, a striking aggregate comparison of new influences and distribution of factors.   Who said SEO is getting easier?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/06/seo-ranking-factors-2009-and-2011-compared.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taking Your Business Seriously?  Then Make Important Calls When Not Driving</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/06/taking-your-business-seriously-then-make-important-calls-when-not-driving.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/06/taking-your-business-seriously-then-make-important-calls-when-not-driving.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improving Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RANT!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmaven.com/?p=4634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I receive a dozen or so inquiries for services a week.  Around 10-15% of those calls are made while the person is driving.  Of those, only a small percent end up being effective conversations. In the study referenced in the link, drivers but not passengers in a “moving” simulator retold a smaller number of central [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buzzmaven.com/2011/06/taking-your-business-seriously-then-make-important-calls-when-not-driving.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

